FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=21.39
Robert Felber
robtone at ek-muc.de
Fri Jul 1 18:17:05 CEST 2011
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:25:13AM -0700, Christopher Hunt wrote:
> Mr. Felber,
> Thank you for you quick reply. I will work with the sender on those
> issues. I will be whitelisting the send or recipient according to
> http://www.policyd-weight.org/faq.html#whitelisting.
>
> I have an additional question though, somewhat related: Do you generally
> recommend that policyd-weight appear last in smtp_recipient_restrictions?
Yes, as it is a expensive (latency) check.
> Here's what I have now:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:12525,
> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname,
> reject_invalid_hostname,
> reject_non_fqdn_hostname
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus,
does that work? Meaning: ommiting the .org TLD.
> reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unauth_destination,
> reject_unlisted_recipient
>
>
> I wonder if I couldn't take some load off of policyd-weight by moving it to
> the end of the list..
>
> -Chris
>
> P.S. the IRC server's .com web site mentioned on the website seems to down,
> but the .net is up
Thanks.
--
Robert Felber, PGP: D1B2F2E5 http://www.selling-it.de
More information about the Policyd-weight-users
mailing list